Image : http://www.flickr.com
I do not want, nor is my intention to politicize the issue of our health care system. Perhaps the policy that the offender derailment any significant progress. I asked this question. We have not allowed health care system in this country in a system "and is not developed?" The system must be paid to look, if you can afford, you live, if not ... We can all imagine the consequences. This should never become a party tool by which participants canClub and their differences. Everyone agrees that the health care system is broken, but completely polarized resolve how. Meanwhile, every town America is paying the price. Sick people are not concerned about party lines, they need medical help. As for me I begin to think as if our elected representatives are more interested in their popularity is what happens at a time in every city in America. While the macro-view is essential for understanding the situation,We can not ignore micro seen.
Let me face the enemy called costs. I find it very interesting that from the economic downturn, health care was broken. I have many open debates, given control of public hearing, such as pork-barrel spending. This is due to a practice of free political activity. Someone has counted the cost? What is the balance that would not be as public projects, and could be as many seriously ill patients have receivedcare right?
A child born with a condition, but the parents refused coverage because the "system", says that has been around a pre-existing condition. So if parents can not afford to pay for treatment, this child should suffer. Not because of an incurable disease, but due to lack of funds. When the child grows up (if they survive) and one adult working, will once again denied coverage, or premiums to be astronomically high. This child is not in health decisions, butare just born that way. As we allow our free enterprise system in place where sellers can get top-post record earnings, while the people are denied as a cover? Is not that a system whose parameters are defined as To Have and Have Not? I am not suggesting or socialized medicine. Although the labor market were to turn around, how many working class people would be able to afford real reference?
The bottom line question for me then what is life? Haveforget the sanctity of life? The profit is now prevalent life? Where do we go from here?
See Also : Proposition 8
No comments:
Post a Comment